What is (Fake) news? analyzing news values (and more) in fake stories

Edson C. Tandoc, Ryan J. Thomas, Lauren Bishop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations


‘Fake news’ has been a topic of controversy during and following the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Much of the scholarship on it to date has focused on the ‘fakeness’ of fake news, illuminating the kinds of deception involved and the motivations of those who deceive. This study looks at the ‘newsness’ of fake news by examining the extent to which it imitates the characteristics and conventions of traditional journalism. Through a content analysis of 886 fake news articles, we find that in terms of news values, topic, and formats, articles published by fake news sites look very much like traditional— and real—news. Most of their articles included the news values of timeliness, negativity, and prominence; were about government and politics; and were written in an inverted pyramid format. However, one point of departure is in terms of objectivity, operationalized as the absence of the author’s personal opinion. The analysis found that the majority of articles analyzed included the opinion of their author or authors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-119
Number of pages10
JournalMedia and Communication
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal).


  • Content analysis
  • Disinformation
  • Fake news
  • Inverted pyramid
  • News values
  • Objectivity
  • Traditional news


Dive into the research topics of 'What is (Fake) news? analyzing news values (and more) in fake stories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this