In Mongolia, the Ecological Footprint (EF) has increased from 6.8 million global hectares (gha) in 1961 to 14.6 million gha in 2012; whilst the Biological capacity (BC) has decreased from 50.6 million gha in 1961 to 39.0 million gha in 2012. Throughout the study period, the grazing land footprint and carbon uptake land footprint have been the two major contributors to the EF variation. If the current trend continues, the EF will surpass the BC by around 2083. To ensure sustainable development in Mongolia, policy directions are advised. For the grazing land footprint, regulating the livestock numbers and herding practice changes are suggested. For the carbon uptake footprint, an increase in the combustion efficiency of the coal fired power plants and the extensive utilization of the renewable energy are suggested. Simple estimations of future carbon dioxide (CO2) emission changes based on various scenarios have been carried out. The amount of CO2 emissions in the mitigation scenarios decreased by up to 31.4% compared with the baseline scenario in 2030 in Mongolia. This case study is the first attempt to propose sustainable development strategies based on the estimation of Mongolia's ecological consumption pattern.
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, funded by the Korea government; the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (MSIP) (NRF-2017R1A2B4006760); and the Ministry of Education (MOE) (NRF-2017R1A6A3A11029726). One of the authors (Volodya, E.) is grateful to the EGPP scholarship from Ewha Womans University. All of the authors would like to thank to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on the manuscript
Funding: This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, funded by the Korea government; the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (MSIP) (NRF-2017R1A2B4006760); and the Ministry of Education (MOE) (NRF-2017R1A6A3A11029726).
© 2018 by the authors.
- Biological Capacity
- Carbon emission
- Coal combustion efficiency
- Ecological Footprint
- Grazing land
- Herding practice
- Livestock types and number control
- Renewable energy