Abstract
Germany and the Republic of Korea (hereafter referred to as Korea) have ambitious goals for a green transformation but follow distinct paths that both have their strengths and weaknesses. Germany is more advanced in emission reduction, energy efficiency and environmental conscious behaviour, while Korea leads in investment in green infrastructure and industries. These distinct traits can be explained by path-dependent political economies. In Germany this created a market-oriented approach that adds an ecological dimension to the German “social market economy”. Korea, on the other hand, follows the path of its “developmental state”, which sees the ecological transformation as an opportunity to achieve industrial development and export leadership in green industries. Both strategies offer important insights for mutual learning as well as lessons for developed and developing countries alike.Emerging Trends in International Development and Climate Policy
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Emerging Trends in International Development and Climate Policy |
| Editors | Stephan Klingebiel, Thomas Kalinowski, Niels Keijzer |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. |
| Pages | 23-37 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-031-65671-2 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-3-031-65670-5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 31 Aug 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy -
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Germany
- South Korea
- Political Economy
- Sustainability
- Developmental State
- Social-ecological market economy
- path dependency
- Transition
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Political Economy of German and Korean Sustainability Transitions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver