TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of environmental regulation on employment
T2 - an empirical study of China’s Two Control Zone policy
AU - Sun, Wenyuan
AU - Yang, Qin
AU - Ni, Qing
AU - Kim, Yoomi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71573136) and the Ewha Womans University Research Grant of 2018.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Environmental regulations affect employment through productivity output and factor substitution. This paper employs a difference-in-differences (DID) method to investigate the effect of China’s Two Control Zones (TCZ) policy on the urban employment in 287 cities from 1994 to 2009. We apply the DID method to two time points: 1998 for policy issuance and 2000 for the policy implementation. From the results of analyses on full-sample cities, the TCZ policy did not contribute to increasing total urban employment. Moreover, a negative impact on employment resulted from sulfur dioxide and acid rain controls in secondary and tertiary industries, respectively. In the acid rain control zone, the TCZ policy increased the average wage of urban workers. Negative effects on employment were observed in larger cities. The policy triggered labor migration from larger to smaller cities, resulting in significant increases in primary and tertiary industry employment in smaller cities, although the effects on mid-size cities were insignificant. This study provides important empirical evidence and insight into the impact of the TCZ policy on urban employment.
AB - Environmental regulations affect employment through productivity output and factor substitution. This paper employs a difference-in-differences (DID) method to investigate the effect of China’s Two Control Zones (TCZ) policy on the urban employment in 287 cities from 1994 to 2009. We apply the DID method to two time points: 1998 for policy issuance and 2000 for the policy implementation. From the results of analyses on full-sample cities, the TCZ policy did not contribute to increasing total urban employment. Moreover, a negative impact on employment resulted from sulfur dioxide and acid rain controls in secondary and tertiary industries, respectively. In the acid rain control zone, the TCZ policy increased the average wage of urban workers. Negative effects on employment were observed in larger cities. The policy triggered labor migration from larger to smaller cities, resulting in significant increases in primary and tertiary industry employment in smaller cities, although the effects on mid-size cities were insignificant. This study provides important empirical evidence and insight into the impact of the TCZ policy on urban employment.
KW - City size
KW - Difference-in-differences
KW - Employment
KW - Environmental regulation
KW - Income
KW - Two Control Zones policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068823912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11356-019-05840-5
DO - 10.1007/s11356-019-05840-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 31290043
AN - SCOPUS:85068823912
SN - 0944-1344
VL - 26
SP - 26472
EP - 26487
JO - Environmental Science and Pollution Research
JF - Environmental Science and Pollution Research
IS - 26
ER -