Abstract
The theories and doctrines related to peacekeeping, mediation, peacebuilding, and statebuilding, as well as other tools used to end war and conflict, raise a range of long-standing questions about the evolution and integrity of what might be called an international peace architecture. A narrow version of this term has begun to appear in the context of peacebuilding through the United Nations, the African Union, the European Union, other regional actors, the international legal system, and the International Financial Institutions. This article proposes a much broader, historical version, with six main theoretical stages, which have, from a critical perspective, produced a substantial, though fragile, international architecture.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 379-400 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | European Journal of International Security |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 4 Nov 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © The Author(s) 2021.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- International Architecture
- International System
- Peace Processes
- Peacebuilding
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The evolution of the international peace architecture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver