The complex relationship between peacebuilding and terrorism approaches: Towards post-terrorism and a post-liberal peace?

Oliver P. Richmond, Ioannis Tellidis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Approaches to terrorism and peacebuilding have a complex relationship with each other, which may be explained according to four categories outlined in this article. These range from blocking each others' aims, nullifying terrorism, supporting a very limited, or a broader peace process. Each of these categories has implications for the inclusion and reconciliation of a wide range of actors and the hybrid nature of the emerging peace. This relates to the critical approach of using theory to create emancipatory forms of peace, which is used as a basis for the examination of the production of hybridity via the interaction of approaches to terrorism and peacebuilding in five cases in this article. These include Sri Lanka, Kashmir, the Middle East, Nepal, and Northern Ireland. We argue that "post-liberal" possibilities for a hybrid form of peace (which are inherent in such conflicts) offer a "post-terrorist" potential for peace processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-143
Number of pages24
JournalTerrorism and Political Violence
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • Hybridity
  • Israel
  • Kashmir
  • Nepal
  • Northern Ireland
  • Palestine
  • Peacebuilding
  • Post-liberal
  • Sri Lanka
  • Terrorism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The complex relationship between peacebuilding and terrorism approaches: Towards post-terrorism and a post-liberal peace?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this