Abstract
Peace operations and associated peacekeeping research have changed dramatically over time. This article reviews the extent to which two prominent strands of peacekeeping research - behavioral-quantitative/quantitative and critical - have reflected changes in peacekeeping practice. Following critiques of how these approaches have fallen short, the article provides a research agenda for each research approach. The article concludes by addressing ways in which the two approaches might be bridged and the barriers to such collaboration therein.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 205-235 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Journal of International Peacekeeping |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- critical theory
- liberal model
- local
- peace operations
- peacebuilding
- peacekeeping
- stabilization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Changing Face(s) of Peace Operations: Critical and Behavioral-Quantitative Paths for Future Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver