Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

TGF-β induces proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors via parallel but distinct Smad pathways

  • Takahiko Nakagawa
  • , Jin H. Li
  • , Gabriela Garcia
  • , Wei Mu
  • , Ester Piek
  • , Erwin P. Böttinger
  • , Yan Chen
  • , Hong J. Zhu
  • , Duk Hee Kang
  • , George F. Schreiner
  • , Hui Y. Lan
  • , Richard J. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

152 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Angiogenesis has a key role in numerous disease processes. One of the most important angiogenic factors is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A), whereas thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) is a major antiangiogenic factor. Recent studies have shown that VEGF-A as well as TSP-1 is regulated by transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), but the mechanism remains unclear. Methods. We examined the role of TGF-β1 and its signaling pathways in mediating expression of these two molecules. Rat proximal tubular cells (NRK52E) were stimulated with TGF-β1 to induce VEGF-A and TSP-1 synthesis. To clarify roles of receptor-activated Smads (R-Smads), we blocked Smad signaling using overexpression of the inhibitory Smad, Smad7, and by using fibroblasts from wild-type or knockout mice. To confirm the antiantigenic role of Smads, soluble Fit-1 regulation in response to TGF-β1 was also examined. In addition, the effect of conditioned media from NRK52E and Smad knockout cells was examined on endothelial cell proliferation. Results. Induction of VEGF-A and TSP-1 by TGF-β1 in NRK52E cells was associated with activation of pathway-restricted R-Smads (Smad2 and 3) and blocking these Smads by overexpression of Smad7 blocked their induction. By using of Smad knockout cells, Smad3 was shown to have a key role in the stimulation of VEGF-A expression whereas Smad2 was critical for TSP-1 expression. Consistent with the hypothesis that Smad2 has an antiangiogenic function, we also demonstrated that Smad2, but not Smad3, mediated the expression of VEGF-A antagonist, soluble VEGF-A receptor sFlt-1, in response to TGF-β1. Conditioned media from NRK52E, which was stimulated by TGF-β1 for 24 hours, did not induce endothelial cell proliferation. However, conditioned media from Smad2 knock-out induced endothelial cell proliferation, whereas endothelial cell proliferation was inhibited by Smad3 knockout-derived conditioned media. Conclusion. R-Smads have distinct roles in mediating the expression of pro- and antiangiogenic growth factors in response to TGF-β1.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)605-613
Number of pages9
JournalKidney International
Volume66
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Support for these studies was provided by National Kidney Fellowship grant (to Takahiko Nakagawa) by NIH DK-52121 (R.J.), and by a George O'Brien Center grant (P50D4-064233–01) (H.Y.L. and R.J.).

Keywords

  • Endothelial cell proliferation
  • Smad KO cell
  • TSP-1
  • VEGF
  • sFlt-1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'TGF-β induces proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors via parallel but distinct Smad pathways'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this