Abstract
The concluding chapter summarizes and synthesizes findings across the different country. This exercise reveals two key points regarding the state-democray nexus. First, stateness is neither a sufficient nor a necessary condition for democratic consolidation. Not only can newly democratising regimes be subject to path-dependent effects but intervening variables – in particular, the organization of particularistic networks - also play a role. Second, democracy will only have a strengthening effect on stateness if all partial regimes are sufficiently consolidated. That is to say, defective democracies do not produce strong incentives for political elites to invest in state-building. These findings are placed in a comparative perspective with ‘third-wave’ democracies in other parts of the world, which shows that our causal mechanisms travel beyond East Asia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Stateness and Democracy in East Asia |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 233-262 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781108862783 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781108495745 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Cambridge University Press 2020.
Keywords
- Africa
- East Asia
- Latin America
- autocracy
- citizen agreement
- democracy
- particularistic networks
- path-dependency
- state capacity
- stateness