TY - JOUR
T1 - Spelling Errors in Korean Students’ Constructed Responses and the Efficacy of Automatic Spelling Correction on Automated Computer Scoring
AU - Lee, Hyeonju
AU - Ha, Minsu
AU - Lee, Jurim
AU - Aini, Rahmi Qurota
AU - Rusmana, Ai Nurlaelasari
AU - Sya’bandari, Yustika
AU - Lee, Jun Ki
AU - Shin, Sein
AU - Lee, Gyeong Geon
AU - Choo, Jaegul
AU - Choi, Sungchul
AU - Kim, Namhyoung
AU - Park, Jisun
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity (KOFAC), and funded by the Korean Government (MOE).
Funding Information:
Since this study was funded by the Ministry of Education of Korea, partner schools and teachers of national research projects voluntarily participated in this study. This study selected schools in consideration of the location of the schools. For instance, schools in the capital city of Seoul and the lower and central regions of Korea were included.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - This study aimed to develop an automated computer scoring system (ACSS) incorporating a Korean spell checker to assess students’ constructed responses and to check the efficacy of this system. To accomplish this, we examined the performance of automatic spelling correction in reporting and correcting spelling errors, the interaction of gender and grade level in making spelling errors, the relationship between spelling errors and academic achievement, and the scoring efficacy of an ACSS that incorporated a spell checker. The analysis of percentage, two-way ANOVA, t-test, Pearson’s correlation, and human–computer correspondence were conducted. The results revealed that an automatic spelling correction system could report 66.44% and correct 26.78% of all total misspelled words. We also found gender and grade-level differences in misspelling words. Students misspelled fewer words as they advanced in grade level, and male students misspelled more words than females. In terms of the relationship between spelling errors and concepts, we found that the number of concepts included in student’s responses had a significant relationship with the total number of written words and misspelled words. This indicates that students who made more spelling errors had discussed more concepts in their responses. Based on these results, we discuss practical implications for preventing students’ responses being scored lower due to spelling errors caused by being less attentive using an ACSS with a spelling correction system.
AB - This study aimed to develop an automated computer scoring system (ACSS) incorporating a Korean spell checker to assess students’ constructed responses and to check the efficacy of this system. To accomplish this, we examined the performance of automatic spelling correction in reporting and correcting spelling errors, the interaction of gender and grade level in making spelling errors, the relationship between spelling errors and academic achievement, and the scoring efficacy of an ACSS that incorporated a spell checker. The analysis of percentage, two-way ANOVA, t-test, Pearson’s correlation, and human–computer correspondence were conducted. The results revealed that an automatic spelling correction system could report 66.44% and correct 26.78% of all total misspelled words. We also found gender and grade-level differences in misspelling words. Students misspelled fewer words as they advanced in grade level, and male students misspelled more words than females. In terms of the relationship between spelling errors and concepts, we found that the number of concepts included in student’s responses had a significant relationship with the total number of written words and misspelled words. This indicates that students who made more spelling errors had discussed more concepts in their responses. Based on these results, we discuss practical implications for preventing students’ responses being scored lower due to spelling errors caused by being less attentive using an ACSS with a spelling correction system.
KW - Automated computer scoring system
KW - Automatic spelling correction system
KW - Computer scoring efficacy
KW - Spelling errors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117251192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10758-021-09568-5
DO - 10.1007/s10758-021-09568-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117251192
SN - 2211-1662
VL - 28
SP - 185
EP - 205
JO - Technology, Knowledge and Learning
JF - Technology, Knowledge and Learning
IS - 1
ER -