Abstract
In many graduate schools of education there is strong resistance to formal theories, especially those that are supported through quantitative empirical methods. In this article we describe how self-determination theory (SDT), a formal and empirically focused framework, shares sensibilities with critical theorists concerning the importance of actors' own embedded experiences of the world, and the importance of liberation and resistance to hegemony. Yet we argue that, unlike many post-modern views that are largely negative, SDT is truly critical precisely because it posits a common human nature, which can be more or less supported and allowed to flourish in different cultural and institutional contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 263-272 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Theory and Research in Education |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2009 |
Keywords
- autonomy
- educational theories
- qualitative research
- self-determination theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Self-determination theory in schools of education:Can an empirically supported framework also be critical and liberating?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver