Securitization in asia: Functional and normative implications

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Among the main objectives of the Ford-IDSS project on Non-Traditional Security Issues in Asia is the development of a conceptual framework which could be used to analyse the dynamics of securitization in the non-Western world. As stated in the introduction, the original work of the Copenhagen School, while providing an excellent start for our investigation, is marked by a number of limitations. Among them is its failure to address why securitization occurs, as opposed to how it occurs. A consideration of the ‘why question’ requires us to pay attention to a number of conditions which may facilitate or impede securitization, including the nature and identity of securitizing actors, the concept of security which is assumed or used by these actors, the process of securitization itself (which remained underspecified in the Copenhagen school) and the outcome of the process, which involves the degree of securitization and the impact on the issue area or the ‘threat’.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNon-Traditional Security in Asia
Subtitle of host publicationDilemmas in Securitization
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages247-250
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)9781351914369
ISBN (Print)9780754647010
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2006 Mely Caballero-Anthony, Ralf Emmers and Amitav Acharya.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Securitization in asia: Functional and normative implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this