Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after previous cancer surgery

Kwang Hyun Kim, Enrique Ian S. Lorenzo, Wooju Jeong, Cheol Kyu Oh, Ho Song Yu, Koon Ho Rha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has become a frequently used alternative treatment option in the management of prostate cancer. As more operations are performed, more challenging patient conditions are encountered, for example those with previous abdominal cancer surgery. We present our experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) in patients with previous cancer surgery. Seven patients with a history of previous surgery for malignancy underwent RALP. All the prostatectomies were performed using the da Vinci™ S surgical system by a single surgeon. All operations were approached transperitoneally. We reviewed perioperative data and surgical outcomes retrospectively. The mean age at surgery was 68.43 years (range 63-82). The mean operative time was 214 ± 47.32 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 500 ml (range 200-1,300). The mean hospital stay was 6.57 ± 2.15 days, and the mean duration of catheterization was 8.29 ± 3.09 days. Nerve-sparing procedure and pelvic lymph node dissection were performed in six patients. Rectal injury occurred in one patient who had undergone hemi-colectomy 15 years previously and was resolved by primary closure. Positive surgical margin was found in three patients. Although one patient had an intraoperative rectal injury, RALP in a patient with previous cancer surgery seems to be feasible and safe in experienced hands.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-227
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Keywords

  • Malignancy
  • Prostate
  • Prostatectomy
  • Robotics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after previous cancer surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this