Risk Factors for Progressive Disease After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Seo Yoon Jang, Yun Gyoo Lee, Sang Hoon Chun, Ji Hyun Park, Keon Uk Park, Hyun Chang, Keun Wook Lee, Hye Ryun Kim, Seong Hoon Shin, Ho Jung An, Kyoung Eun Lee, In Gyu Hwang, Myung Ju Ahn, Sung Bae Kim, Bhumsuk Keam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: This study analyzed the clinical features of patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), who developed progressive disease (PD) after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 256 patients with R/M HNSCC treated with ICIs at 11 medical centers. Associations between the treatment outcomes―best response, overall survival, and progression-free survival―and various clinical factors were analyzed. Results: The objective response rate was 19.5% and PD was observed in 50.4% of the patients. A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR > 4; HR, 2.20 [1.28–3.78]) and large tumor size (sum of the target lesions > 40 mm; HR, 1.74 [1.03–2.94]) were significant risk factors for PD. High NLR (HR, 2.00 [1.42–2.82]), poor performance status (ECOG PS 2–3; HR, 3.51 [2.04–6.05]), and large tumor size (HR. 1.63 [1.19–2.24]) were independently associated with poor overall survival. Conclusions: Patients with high NLR and large tumor size are at higher risk of PD during ICI therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1621-1630
Number of pages10
JournalHead and Neck
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords

  • head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
  • immune checkpoint inhibitor
  • neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
  • progressive disease
  • recurrent and/or metastatic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk Factors for Progressive Disease After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this