Restoration of complicated epicanthus modified reverse skin redraping with mini-epicanthoplasty for rescue in unsatisfied epicanthoplasty patients

Yoon Jae Chung, Kyung Eun Han, Bo Young Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: We had reported the surgical outcome of reverse skin redraping technique for restoration of previously performed epicanthoplasty. In this study, we introduce a modified reverse skin redraping technique that added miniepicanthoplasty in patients with unsatisfactory results after epicanthoplasty. Methods: Three hundred twenty-four patients (288 female and 36 male patients) who had unsatisfied results with previous epicanthoplasty and that were treated with our modified restoration surgery were included in this study. Results: The mean preoperative interepicanthal distance was 33.6 mm, and the mean postoperative interepicanthal distance was 36.9 mm; the mean difference in the interepicanthal distance before and after restoration surgery was 3.3 mm. Satisfactory aesthetic results were obtained with improvements in areas of asymmetry, overexposure of the caruncle, and the appearance of the previous scar. Only minor complications developed in 15 patients (4.6%) that were resolved with minor revisions. No severe complications requiring reoperations were noted. Conclusions: Our modified method involving reverse skin redraping and miniepicanthoplasty is simple and reproducible and is useful for resolution of unsatisfactory results to obtain a naturally shaped epicanthus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)613-617
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Plastic Surgery
Volume78
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Epicanthal reconstruction
  • Epicanthal restoration
  • Epicanthoplasty
  • Mini-epicanthoplasty
  • Reverse skin redraping
  • Unsatisfactory results

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Restoration of complicated epicanthus modified reverse skin redraping with mini-epicanthoplasty for rescue in unsatisfied epicanthoplasty patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this