Psychometric validation of the Korean version of structured interview for post-traumatic stress disorder (K-SIP)

Won Kim; Daeho Kim; Ho Jun Seo; Sang Yeol Lee; Seung Ho Ryu; Jung Bum Kim; Moon Yong Chung; Young Jin Koo; Seong Gon Ryu; Eui Jung Kim; Tae Suk Kim; Hyun Kook Lim; Jong Min Woo; Jeong Ho Chae

doi:10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.26

Psychometric validation of the Korean version of structured interview for post-traumatic stress disorder (K-SIP)

Won Kim, Daeho Kim, Ho Jun Seo, Sang Yeol Lee, Seung Ho Ryu, Jung Bum Kim, Moon Yong Chung, Young Jin Koo, Seong Gon Ryu, Eui Jung Kim, Tae Suk Kim, Hyun Kook Lim, Jong Min Woo, Jeong Ho Chae

Department of Psychiatry

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

For diagnosis and management of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the easily administered assessment tool is essential. Structured Interview for PTSD (SIP) is a validated, 17-item, simple measurement being used widely. We aimed to develop the Korean version of SIP (K-SIP) and investigated its psychometric properties. Ninety-three subjects with PTSD, 73 subjects with mood disorder or anxiety disorder as a psychiatric control group, and 88 subjects as a healthy control group were enrolled in this study. All subjects completed psychometric assessments that included the K-SIP, the Korean versions of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and other assessment tools. The K-SIP presented good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.92) and test-retest reliability (r=0.87). K-SIP showed strong correlations with CAPS (r=0.72). Among three groups including PTSD patients, psychiatric controls, and normal controls, there were significant differences in the K-SIP total score. The potential cut-off total score of K-SIP was 20 with highest diagnostic efficiency (91.9%). At this point, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% and 88.4%, respectively. Our result showed that K-SIP had good reliability and validity. We expect that K-SIP will be used as a simple but structured instrument for assessment of PTSD.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	26-31
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of Korean Medical Science
Volume	24
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.26
State	Published - Feb 2009

Keywords

Post-Traumatic
Stress disorder
Validation studies

Access to Document

10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.26

Cite this

Kim, W., Kim, D., Seo, H. J., Lee, S. Y., Ryu, S. H., Kim, J. B., Chung, M. Y., Koo, Y. J., Ryu, S. G., Kim, E. J., Kim, T. S., Lim, H. K., Woo, J. M., & Chae, J. H. (2009). Psychometric validation of the Korean version of structured interview for post-traumatic stress disorder (K-SIP). Journal of Korean Medical Science, 24(1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.26

@article{ce6a8780423d49d08e6ce9f79ca21788,

title = "Psychometric validation of the Korean version of structured interview for post-traumatic stress disorder (K-SIP)",

abstract = "For diagnosis and management of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the easily administered assessment tool is essential. Structured Interview for PTSD (SIP) is a validated, 17-item, simple measurement being used widely. We aimed to develop the Korean version of SIP (K-SIP) and investigated its psychometric properties. Ninety-three subjects with PTSD, 73 subjects with mood disorder or anxiety disorder as a psychiatric control group, and 88 subjects as a healthy control group were enrolled in this study. All subjects completed psychometric assessments that included the K-SIP, the Korean versions of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and other assessment tools. The K-SIP presented good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.92) and test-retest reliability (r=0.87). K-SIP showed strong correlations with CAPS (r=0.72). Among three groups including PTSD patients, psychiatric controls, and normal controls, there were significant differences in the K-SIP total score. The potential cut-off total score of K-SIP was 20 with highest diagnostic efficiency (91.9%). At this point, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% and 88.4%, respectively. Our result showed that K-SIP had good reliability and validity. We expect that K-SIP will be used as a simple but structured instrument for assessment of PTSD.",

keywords = "Post-Traumatic, Stress disorder, Validation studies",

author = "Won Kim and Daeho Kim and Seo, {Ho Jun} and Lee, {Sang Yeol} and Ryu, {Seung Ho} and Kim, {Jung Bum} and Chung, {Moon Yong} and Koo, {Young Jin} and Ryu, {Seong Gon} and Kim, {Eui Jung} and Kim, {Tae Suk} and Lim, {Hyun Kook} and Woo, {Jong Min} and Chae, {Jeong Ho}",

year = "2009",

month = feb,

doi = "10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.26",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "26--31",

journal = "Journal of Korean Medical Science",

issn = "1011-8934",

publisher = "Korean Academy of Medical Science",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric validation of the Korean version of structured interview for post-traumatic stress disorder (K-SIP)

AU - Kim, Won

AU - Kim, Daeho

AU - Seo, Ho Jun

AU - Lee, Sang Yeol

AU - Ryu, Seung Ho

AU - Kim, Jung Bum

AU - Chung, Moon Yong

AU - Koo, Young Jin

AU - Ryu, Seong Gon

AU - Kim, Eui Jung

AU - Kim, Tae Suk

AU - Lim, Hyun Kook

AU - Woo, Jong Min

AU - Chae, Jeong Ho

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - For diagnosis and management of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the easily administered assessment tool is essential. Structured Interview for PTSD (SIP) is a validated, 17-item, simple measurement being used widely. We aimed to develop the Korean version of SIP (K-SIP) and investigated its psychometric properties. Ninety-three subjects with PTSD, 73 subjects with mood disorder or anxiety disorder as a psychiatric control group, and 88 subjects as a healthy control group were enrolled in this study. All subjects completed psychometric assessments that included the K-SIP, the Korean versions of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and other assessment tools. The K-SIP presented good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.92) and test-retest reliability (r=0.87). K-SIP showed strong correlations with CAPS (r=0.72). Among three groups including PTSD patients, psychiatric controls, and normal controls, there were significant differences in the K-SIP total score. The potential cut-off total score of K-SIP was 20 with highest diagnostic efficiency (91.9%). At this point, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% and 88.4%, respectively. Our result showed that K-SIP had good reliability and validity. We expect that K-SIP will be used as a simple but structured instrument for assessment of PTSD.

AB - For diagnosis and management of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the easily administered assessment tool is essential. Structured Interview for PTSD (SIP) is a validated, 17-item, simple measurement being used widely. We aimed to develop the Korean version of SIP (K-SIP) and investigated its psychometric properties. Ninety-three subjects with PTSD, 73 subjects with mood disorder or anxiety disorder as a psychiatric control group, and 88 subjects as a healthy control group were enrolled in this study. All subjects completed psychometric assessments that included the K-SIP, the Korean versions of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and other assessment tools. The K-SIP presented good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.92) and test-retest reliability (r=0.87). K-SIP showed strong correlations with CAPS (r=0.72). Among three groups including PTSD patients, psychiatric controls, and normal controls, there were significant differences in the K-SIP total score. The potential cut-off total score of K-SIP was 20 with highest diagnostic efficiency (91.9%). At this point, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% and 88.4%, respectively. Our result showed that K-SIP had good reliability and validity. We expect that K-SIP will be used as a simple but structured instrument for assessment of PTSD.

KW - Post-Traumatic

KW - Stress disorder

KW - Validation studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65649120327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.26

DO - 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.26

M3 - Article

C2 - 19270809

AN - SCOPUS:65649120327

SN - 1011-8934

VL - 24

SP - 26

EP - 31

JO - Journal of Korean Medical Science

JF - Journal of Korean Medical Science

IS - 1

ER -

Psychometric validation of the Korean version of structured interview for post-traumatic stress disorder (K-SIP)

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this