TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting clinical outcomes using artificial intelligence and machine learning in neonatal intensive care units
T2 - a systematic review
AU - McAdams, Ryan M.
AU - Kaur, Ravneet
AU - Sun, Yao
AU - Bindra, Harlieen
AU - Cho, Su Jin
AU - Singh, Harpreet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Advances in technology, data availability, and analytics have helped improve quality of care in the neonatal intensive care unit. Objective: To provide an in-depth review of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning techniques being utilized to predict neonatal outcomes. Methods: The PRISMA protocol was followed that considered articles from established digital repositories. Included articles were categorized based on predictions of: (a) major neonatal morbidities such as sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and retinopathy of prematurity; (b) mortality; and (c) length of stay. Results: A total of 366 studies were considered; 68 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. The current set of predictor models are primarily built on supervised learning and mostly used regression models built on retrospective data. Conclusion: With the availability of EMR data and data-sharing of NICU outcomes across neonatal research networks, machine learning algorithms have shown breakthrough performance in predicting neonatal disease.
AB - Background: Advances in technology, data availability, and analytics have helped improve quality of care in the neonatal intensive care unit. Objective: To provide an in-depth review of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning techniques being utilized to predict neonatal outcomes. Methods: The PRISMA protocol was followed that considered articles from established digital repositories. Included articles were categorized based on predictions of: (a) major neonatal morbidities such as sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and retinopathy of prematurity; (b) mortality; and (c) length of stay. Results: A total of 366 studies were considered; 68 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. The current set of predictor models are primarily built on supervised learning and mostly used regression models built on retrospective data. Conclusion: With the availability of EMR data and data-sharing of NICU outcomes across neonatal research networks, machine learning algorithms have shown breakthrough performance in predicting neonatal disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132634718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41372-022-01392-8
DO - 10.1038/s41372-022-01392-8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35562414
AN - SCOPUS:85132634718
SN - 0743-8346
VL - 42
SP - 1561
EP - 1575
JO - Journal of Perinatology
JF - Journal of Perinatology
IS - 12
ER -