Predicted 25(OH)D score and colorectal cancer risk according to vitamin D receptor expression

  • Seungyoun Jung
  • , Zhi Rong Qian
  • , Mai Yamauchi
  • , Kimberly A. Bertrand
  • , Kathryn C. Fitzgerald
  • , Kentaro Inamura
  • , Sun A. Kim
  • , Kosuke Mima
  • , Yasutaka Sukawa
  • , Xuehong Zhang
  • , Molin Wang
  • , Stephanie A. Smith-Warner
  • , Kana Wu
  • , Charles S. Fuchs
  • , Andrew T. Chan
  • , Edward L. Giovannucci
  • , Kimmie Ng
  • , Eunyoung Cho
  • , Shuji Ogino
  • , Reiko Nishihara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Despite accumulating evidence for the preventive effect of vitamin D on colorectal carcinogenesis, its precise mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesized that vitamin D was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer with high-level vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression, but not with risk of tumor with low-level VDR expression. Methods: Among 140,418 participants followed from 1986 through 2008 in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals' Follow-up Study, we identified 1,059 incident colorectal cancer cases with tumor molecular data. The predicted 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] score was developed using the known determinants of plasma 25(OH)D. We estimated the HR for cancer subtypes using the duplication method Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A higher predicted 25(OH)D score was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer irrespective of VDR expression level (P heterogeneity for subtypes = 0.75). Multivariate HRs (95% confidence intervals) comparing the highest with the lowest quintile of predicted 25(OH)D scores were 0.48 (0.30-0.78) for VDR-negative tumor and 0.56 (0.42-0.75) for VDR-positive tumor. Similarly, the significant inverse associations of the predicted 25(OH)D score with colorectal cancer risk did not significantly differ by KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA status (Pheterogeneity for subtypes ≥ 0.22). Conclusions: A higher predicted vitamin D score was significantly associated with a lower colorectal cancer risk, regardless of VDR status and other molecular features examined. Impact: The preventive effect of vitamin D on colorectal carcinogenesis may not totally depend on tumor factors. Host factors (such as local and systemic immunity) may need to be considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1628-1637
Number of pages10
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicted 25(OH)D score and colorectal cancer risk according to vitamin D receptor expression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this