Abstract
Second-order latent growth models (SLGMs) have recently been highlighted over the traditional first-order latent growth model. Although SLGMs can show several intuitive strengths, the model has remained less understood due to the issue of scaling-related misspecification. As one source of model misspecification, scaling could influence the estimation of SLGM. Since the impact could differ depending on which scaling method is employed, selecting a scaling method becomes crucial for the practical use of SLGM. The present study investigated and compared the impact of two different scaling methods for the estimation of SLGM under various partial measurement invariance situations. The results of comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations do not support a single superior scaling method under all generated partial MI conditions. In this regard, the careful and strategic selection of a scaling method in the context of SLGM is required, as discussed in the final section of the study.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 261-277 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Structural Equation Modeling |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5A2A03041362).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Keywords
- effects coding
- longitudinal measurement invariance
- marker variable
- scaling methods
- Second-order latent growth models