TY - GEN
T1 - On the utility of subharmonic microbubble signals to detect portal hypertension
AU - Dave, Jaydev K.
AU - Halldorsdottir, Valgerdur G.
AU - Eisenbrey, John R.
AU - Merton, Daniel A.
AU - Liu, Ji Bin
AU - Zhou, Jian Hua
AU - Wang, Hsin Kai
AU - Park, Suhyun
AU - Dianis, Scott
AU - Chalek, Carl L.
AU - Lin, Feng
AU - Thomenius, Kai E.
AU - Brown, Daniel B.
AU - Forsberg, Flemming
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - In this work, the efficacy of subharmonic aided pressure estimation to detect portal hypertension (PH; i.e., portal vein (PV) pressures > 6-10 mmHg) is investigated. A Logiq 9 ultrasound scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) with a 4C probe (transmit/receive: 2.5/1.25 MHz) was configured to obtain unprocessed radiofrequency (RF) data post pulse inversion. Fourteen canines were scanned. The main PV was accessed following a mid-line abdominal incision. Acute PH was induced using Gelfoam administration (8 canines; low-flow PH model) and using an arteriovenous fistula (6 canines; femoral artery to PV; high-flow PH model). A Millar pressure catheter introduced in the main PV indicated reference PV pressures. The RF data corresponding to 4 transmit cycles at 20 % and 40 % incident acoustic power (IAP) levels and pressure catheter data were acquired synchronously during infusion of Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway; 0.015 μl/kg/min) microbubbles, before and after inducing PH (5 s acquisitions; n = 3). The mean subharmonic amplitude from all acquired frames was extracted from the RF data corresponding to PV location. Linear regression analyses with leave-one-out cross validation technique were used to obtain PV pressures from the subharmonic amplitude (data from 3 canines was excluded due to extraneous conditions). The resulting PV pressures were compared to pressure catheter data. Overall, mean errors were-0.15 mmHg (p = 0.92) and-0.09 mmHg (p = 0.95) with 20 and 40 % IAP levels, respectively. For baseline PV pressures, mean errors were 3.50 mmHg (p = 0.11) and 3.64 mmHg (p = 0.10), while for PH pressures the mean errors were-3.80 mmHg (p = 0.07) and-3.83 mmHg (p = 0.06), with 20 and 40 % IAP levels, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of detecting moderate through severe PH (cut-off value: 16 mmHg PV pressure) in this cohort (n = 9) were 78 %, 69 % and 73 % for 20 % IAP and 78 %, 77 % and 77 % for 40 % IAP. Ambient pressure modulated subharmonic signals can be used for detecting PH in canines and thus, might be used to diagnose patients in the future.
AB - In this work, the efficacy of subharmonic aided pressure estimation to detect portal hypertension (PH; i.e., portal vein (PV) pressures > 6-10 mmHg) is investigated. A Logiq 9 ultrasound scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) with a 4C probe (transmit/receive: 2.5/1.25 MHz) was configured to obtain unprocessed radiofrequency (RF) data post pulse inversion. Fourteen canines were scanned. The main PV was accessed following a mid-line abdominal incision. Acute PH was induced using Gelfoam administration (8 canines; low-flow PH model) and using an arteriovenous fistula (6 canines; femoral artery to PV; high-flow PH model). A Millar pressure catheter introduced in the main PV indicated reference PV pressures. The RF data corresponding to 4 transmit cycles at 20 % and 40 % incident acoustic power (IAP) levels and pressure catheter data were acquired synchronously during infusion of Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway; 0.015 μl/kg/min) microbubbles, before and after inducing PH (5 s acquisitions; n = 3). The mean subharmonic amplitude from all acquired frames was extracted from the RF data corresponding to PV location. Linear regression analyses with leave-one-out cross validation technique were used to obtain PV pressures from the subharmonic amplitude (data from 3 canines was excluded due to extraneous conditions). The resulting PV pressures were compared to pressure catheter data. Overall, mean errors were-0.15 mmHg (p = 0.92) and-0.09 mmHg (p = 0.95) with 20 and 40 % IAP levels, respectively. For baseline PV pressures, mean errors were 3.50 mmHg (p = 0.11) and 3.64 mmHg (p = 0.10), while for PH pressures the mean errors were-3.80 mmHg (p = 0.07) and-3.83 mmHg (p = 0.06), with 20 and 40 % IAP levels, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of detecting moderate through severe PH (cut-off value: 16 mmHg PV pressure) in this cohort (n = 9) were 78 %, 69 % and 73 % for 20 % IAP and 78 %, 77 % and 77 % for 40 % IAP. Ambient pressure modulated subharmonic signals can be used for detecting PH in canines and thus, might be used to diagnose patients in the future.
KW - Subharmonic aided pressure estimation
KW - noninvasive pressure estimation
KW - portal hypertension
KW - portal vein pressure
KW - ultrasound contrast agents
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882420578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0163
DO - 10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0163
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84882420578
SN - 9781467345613
T3 - IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS
SP - 655
EP - 658
BT - 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2012
T2 - 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2012
Y2 - 7 October 2012 through 10 October 2012
ER -