TY - JOUR
T1 - Noncontrast-enhanced peripheral venography using velocity-selective magnetization preparation and transient balanced SSFP
AU - Shin, Taehoon
AU - Kligerman, Seth J.
AU - Crawford, Robert S.
AU - Rajagopalan, Sanjay
AU - Gullapalli, Rao P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - Purpose To develop a three-dimensional (3D) noncontrast-enhanced (NCE) peripheral magnetic resonance venography (MRV) method and demonstrate its feasibility in vivo. Methods The proposed MRV pulse sequence consisted of a velocity-selective (VS) inversion preparation module, inversion delay time (TI), fat inversion pulse, and 3D balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) dummy excitations and readout. The VS preparation module inverted arterial blood, which recovered close to zero magnetization during TI. The TI and the number of dummy excitations (Nnum) were numerically optimized for maximizing vein-to-background contrast and tested in a healthy subject. The proposed MRV of the entire peripheral system, using four-station acquisition, was performed in six healthy subjects and three peripheral artery patients. Results The numerical optimization yielded TI = 350 ms and Ndum = 40, which was supported by the largest vein contrast among the parameters chosen around the optima on in vivo venograms. Four-station peripheral MRV using the optimized parameters well visualized all major deep veins with high vein-to-background contrast. The relative vein contrast ratios were 0.80 ± 0.08, 0.75 ± 0.07, and 0.84 ± 0.06 against the arteries, muscle, and fat, respectively. Conclusion The proposed NCE MRV using VS preparation and transient bSSFP can generate high-contrast peripheral venograms directly with a single acquisition.
AB - Purpose To develop a three-dimensional (3D) noncontrast-enhanced (NCE) peripheral magnetic resonance venography (MRV) method and demonstrate its feasibility in vivo. Methods The proposed MRV pulse sequence consisted of a velocity-selective (VS) inversion preparation module, inversion delay time (TI), fat inversion pulse, and 3D balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) dummy excitations and readout. The VS preparation module inverted arterial blood, which recovered close to zero magnetization during TI. The TI and the number of dummy excitations (Nnum) were numerically optimized for maximizing vein-to-background contrast and tested in a healthy subject. The proposed MRV of the entire peripheral system, using four-station acquisition, was performed in six healthy subjects and three peripheral artery patients. Results The numerical optimization yielded TI = 350 ms and Ndum = 40, which was supported by the largest vein contrast among the parameters chosen around the optima on in vivo venograms. Four-station peripheral MRV using the optimized parameters well visualized all major deep veins with high vein-to-background contrast. The relative vein contrast ratios were 0.80 ± 0.08, 0.75 ± 0.07, and 0.84 ± 0.06 against the arteries, muscle, and fat, respectively. Conclusion The proposed NCE MRV using VS preparation and transient bSSFP can generate high-contrast peripheral venograms directly with a single acquisition.
KW - noncontrast-enhanced MR venography
KW - peripheral venography
KW - transient balanced SSFP
KW - velocity-selective excitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957108409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mrm.25623
DO - 10.1002/mrm.25623
M3 - Article
C2 - 25824323
AN - SCOPUS:84957108409
SN - 0740-3194
VL - 75
SP - 653
EP - 664
JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
IS - 2
ER -