TY - JOUR
T1 - New application of dual point 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of neoadjuvant chemoradiation response of locally advanced rectal cancer
AU - Yoon, Hai Jeon
AU - Kim, Seok Ki
AU - Kim, Tae Sung
AU - Im, Hyung Jun
AU - Lee, Eun Seong
AU - Kim, Hyun Chul
AU - Park, Ji Won
AU - Chang, Hee Jin
AU - Choi, Hyo Seong
AU - Kim, Dae Yong
AU - Oh, Jae Hwan
PY - 2013/1
Y1 - 2013/1
N2 - PURPOSE: FDG PET/CT has been suggested as the most reliable modality to predict pathological tumor responses after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, several confounding factors including radiation-induced inflammation could not be easily avoided with the commonly used single-point FDG PET/CT. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of a dual-point PET/CT protocol in LARC response prediction to CRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one LARC patients were enrolled and treated with neoadjuvant CRT. PET/CT was performed before and after CRT. Dual-point acquisition was applied to post-CRT PET/CT. Post-CRT SUVmax (postSUV), pre/post-CRT SUVmax change (RI), and dual-point index (DI) of post-CRT PET/CT were compared with the Dworak tumor regression grade (TRG) as a gold standard. Univariate and multivariate analyses, as well as receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, were used to evaluate the predictive ability of demographic, clinical, and metabolic PET parameters. RESULTS: Fifteen patients of TRG3-4 were defined as pathological responders, and 46 patients of TRG1-2 were nonresponders. The resulting response index (RI) ranged from -13 to 94.8% (59.1 ± 22.0%), and delay index (DI) ranged from -45.2 to 25.0% (-9.1 ± 12.1%). Univariate analysis resulted in PET parameters (postSUV, RI, and DI) as significant predictors (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P < 0.0001). According to multivariate analysis, RI and DI remained as significant predictors (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0004). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that DI had significantly higher area under the curve compared with RI (0.906 vs 0.696, P = 0.018). Delay index had 86.7% sensitivity, 87.0% specificity, 68.4% positive predictive value, 95.2% negative predictive value, and 86.9% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-point post-CRT PET/CT can predict pathological tumor response better than conventional single time point pre- and post-CRT PET/CT.
AB - PURPOSE: FDG PET/CT has been suggested as the most reliable modality to predict pathological tumor responses after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, several confounding factors including radiation-induced inflammation could not be easily avoided with the commonly used single-point FDG PET/CT. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of a dual-point PET/CT protocol in LARC response prediction to CRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one LARC patients were enrolled and treated with neoadjuvant CRT. PET/CT was performed before and after CRT. Dual-point acquisition was applied to post-CRT PET/CT. Post-CRT SUVmax (postSUV), pre/post-CRT SUVmax change (RI), and dual-point index (DI) of post-CRT PET/CT were compared with the Dworak tumor regression grade (TRG) as a gold standard. Univariate and multivariate analyses, as well as receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, were used to evaluate the predictive ability of demographic, clinical, and metabolic PET parameters. RESULTS: Fifteen patients of TRG3-4 were defined as pathological responders, and 46 patients of TRG1-2 were nonresponders. The resulting response index (RI) ranged from -13 to 94.8% (59.1 ± 22.0%), and delay index (DI) ranged from -45.2 to 25.0% (-9.1 ± 12.1%). Univariate analysis resulted in PET parameters (postSUV, RI, and DI) as significant predictors (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P < 0.0001). According to multivariate analysis, RI and DI remained as significant predictors (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0004). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that DI had significantly higher area under the curve compared with RI (0.906 vs 0.696, P = 0.018). Delay index had 86.7% sensitivity, 87.0% specificity, 68.4% positive predictive value, 95.2% negative predictive value, and 86.9% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-point post-CRT PET/CT can predict pathological tumor response better than conventional single time point pre- and post-CRT PET/CT.
KW - DI
KW - Dworak tumor regression grade
KW - dual point PET/CT
KW - neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
KW - rectal cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871654740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182639a58
DO - 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182639a58
M3 - Article
C2 - 23242038
AN - SCOPUS:84871654740
SN - 0363-9762
VL - 38
SP - 7
EP - 12
JO - Clinical Nuclear Medicine
JF - Clinical Nuclear Medicine
IS - 1
ER -