Abstract
The purpose of this essay is to describe the Taliban Korean hostage situation in a theoretical perspective, and to suggest possible strategies of enhancing the negotiation power of the threatened. The results show that dealing with terrorists should be a constant dialectical process of firmness and softness. A government negotiator should be adamant about the principle, but at the same time seek alternative options to turn the current hostage negotiation into a route for possible agreements.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 263-268 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Public Relations Review |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Angry public
- Chicken game
- Conflict resolution
- Hostage
- Iterated game
- Negotiation
- Terrorist
- Two-level negotiation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Negotiating with terrorists: The iterated game of the Taliban Korean hostage case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver