TY - JOUR
T1 - Nationwide Survey for Current Status of Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Korea
AU - Chung, Hae Sun
AU - Park, Jeong Su
AU - Shin, Bo Moon
AU - Yoo, Hyeon Mi
AU - Kim, Heejung
AU - Cho, Jihyun
AU - Lee, Chae Hoon
AU - Ryoo, Nam Hee
AU - Kim, Jae Seok
AU - Chung, Jae Woo
AU - Hong, Ki Ho
AU - Kim, You Sun
AU - Cho, Young Seok
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The interest in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has increased, and the choice of assays became wider since the first national survey in Korea on CDI diagnosis in 2015. We conducted a survey of the domestic CDI assays with more varied questions to understand the current situation in Korea. Methods: In April 2018, about 50 questions on the current status of CDI assays and details on implementation and perceptions were written, and a survey questionnaire was administered to laboratory medicine specialists in 200 institutions. Results: One-hundred and fifty institutions responded to the questionnaire, of which 90 (60.0%) including one commercial laboratory, performed CDI assays. The toxin AB enzyme immunoassay (toxin AB EIA), nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), and C. difficile culture, glutamate dehydrogenase assay, alone or in combination with other assays, were used in 75 (84.3%), 52 (58.4%), 35 (36.0%), and 23 (25.8%), respectively, and 65 (73.0%) institutions performed a combination of two or more assays. The sensitivity of toxin AB EIA was more negatively perceived, and that on specificity was more positively perceived. The perception of sensitivity and specificity of NAAT was mostly positive. Perception on the algorithm test projected it as useful but in need of countermeasures. Sixty-three (73.3%) institutions responded that they performed surveillance on CDI. Conclusion: This study provides useful evidence on the current status of CDI laboratory diagnosis in Korea as well as on items that require improvement and is thought to aid in standardizing and improving the CDI laboratory diagnosis in Korea.
AB - Background: The interest in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has increased, and the choice of assays became wider since the first national survey in Korea on CDI diagnosis in 2015. We conducted a survey of the domestic CDI assays with more varied questions to understand the current situation in Korea. Methods: In April 2018, about 50 questions on the current status of CDI assays and details on implementation and perceptions were written, and a survey questionnaire was administered to laboratory medicine specialists in 200 institutions. Results: One-hundred and fifty institutions responded to the questionnaire, of which 90 (60.0%) including one commercial laboratory, performed CDI assays. The toxin AB enzyme immunoassay (toxin AB EIA), nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), and C. difficile culture, glutamate dehydrogenase assay, alone or in combination with other assays, were used in 75 (84.3%), 52 (58.4%), 35 (36.0%), and 23 (25.8%), respectively, and 65 (73.0%) institutions performed a combination of two or more assays. The sensitivity of toxin AB EIA was more negatively perceived, and that on specificity was more positively perceived. The perception of sensitivity and specificity of NAAT was mostly positive. Perception on the algorithm test projected it as useful but in need of countermeasures. Sixty-three (73.3%) institutions responded that they performed surveillance on CDI. Conclusion: This study provides useful evidence on the current status of CDI laboratory diagnosis in Korea as well as on items that require improvement and is thought to aid in standardizing and improving the CDI laboratory diagnosis in Korea.
KW - Clostridioides difficile Infection
KW - Culture
KW - Glutamate Dehydrogenase
KW - Laboratory Diagnosis
KW - Nucleic Acid Amplification Test
KW - Survey
KW - Toxin AB Enzyme Immunoassay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124281768&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3346/JKMS.2022.37.E38
DO - 10.3346/JKMS.2022.37.E38
M3 - Article
C2 - 35132844
AN - SCOPUS:85124281768
SN - 1011-8934
VL - 37
JO - Journal of Korean Medical Science
JF - Journal of Korean Medical Science
IS - 5
M1 - e38
ER -