TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling sulfamethoxazole removal by pump-less in-series forward osmosis–ultrafiltration hybrid processes using artificial neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and support vector machine
AU - Nam, Seong Nam
AU - Yea, Yeonji
AU - Park, Soyoung
AU - Park, Chanhyuk
AU - Heo, Jiyong
AU - Jang, Min
AU - Park, Chang Min
AU - Yoon, Yeomin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/10/15
Y1 - 2023/10/15
N2 - This study presented an in-series forward osmosis–ultrafiltration (FO–UF) hybrid system for sulfamethoxazole (SMX) removal. Artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and support vector machine were employed to predict water flux and SMX removals by FO and FO–UF. This investigation relied on 60 experimental data sets that varied the initial draw solution (DS) concentration (1–5 M), initial SMX concentration (2.5–12.5 mg/L), initial pH (3–11), and natural organic matter (NOM) content (0–18 mg/L as dissolved organic carbon). Experimental results demonstrated that the hybrid system achieved 83%–93% and 91%–99% SMX removals via FO and FO–UF, respectively, while the obtained water flux was 5–14 L/m2h. From the three machine learning models, ANN had the most accurate prediction results, with statistical R2 of 0.96, 0.91 and 0.99 for water flux and SMX removals by FO and FO–UF, respectively. For the best ANN model, relative importance of the input variables to water flux and SMX removals by FO and FO–UF, respectively, was in the following order: DS concentration (41%, 49% and 36% in the aforementioned order), NOM concentration (21%–28%), initial SMX concentration (15%–24%) and initial pH (11%–17%).
AB - This study presented an in-series forward osmosis–ultrafiltration (FO–UF) hybrid system for sulfamethoxazole (SMX) removal. Artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and support vector machine were employed to predict water flux and SMX removals by FO and FO–UF. This investigation relied on 60 experimental data sets that varied the initial draw solution (DS) concentration (1–5 M), initial SMX concentration (2.5–12.5 mg/L), initial pH (3–11), and natural organic matter (NOM) content (0–18 mg/L as dissolved organic carbon). Experimental results demonstrated that the hybrid system achieved 83%–93% and 91%–99% SMX removals via FO and FO–UF, respectively, while the obtained water flux was 5–14 L/m2h. From the three machine learning models, ANN had the most accurate prediction results, with statistical R2 of 0.96, 0.91 and 0.99 for water flux and SMX removals by FO and FO–UF, respectively. For the best ANN model, relative importance of the input variables to water flux and SMX removals by FO and FO–UF, respectively, was in the following order: DS concentration (41%, 49% and 36% in the aforementioned order), NOM concentration (21%–28%), initial SMX concentration (15%–24%) and initial pH (11%–17%).
KW - Machine learning
KW - Membrane filtration
KW - Neural network
KW - Pharmaceutical contaminant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170430240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2023.145821
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2023.145821
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85170430240
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 474
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 145821
ER -