Message framing and defensive processing: A cultural examination

Deborah M. Ko, Heejung S. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Past research has shown that health messages on safer sexual practices that focus on relational consequences are more persuasive than messages that focus on personal consequences. However, we theorize that it is defensiveness against personal risk framing that threatens the self among people from more individualistic cultures. Two studies tested this idea. Study 1 showed that European Americans were less persuaded by personal framing than by relational framing but that this pattern was not found for Asian Americans, who are more collectivistic. Study 2 showed that these defensive patterns were eliminated among European American participants when a person's self-image was affirmed. These results suggest defensive processes as the mechanism behind the differences in message framing effectiveness and motivate a closer look at cultural patterns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-68
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Communication
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Message framing and defensive processing: A cultural examination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this