TY - JOUR
T1 - Melting Point Prediction of Organic Crystals Using Direct Molecular Dynamics Simulations
AU - Chi, Nahyun
AU - Han, Jungim
AU - Won, Joonghee
AU - Kim, Jun Soo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2025/6/18
Y1 - 2025/6/18
N2 - Accurate melting point prediction is essential for investigating the molecular mechanisms of crystal growth and melting using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Here, we assess melting point predictions from direct MD simulations of nitromethane and acetic acid. This study has three objectives: to evaluate popular force fields (CGenFF, OPLS, GAFF), to assess various MD approaches (simulations of solid/liquid, vapor/solid/liquid/vapor, vapor/solid/vapor, and solid alone), and to compare the crystal growth and melting of both compounds, focusing specifically on the time scale and anisotropy. Our results indicate that none of the popular force fields accurately predict melting points, highlighting the need for improvement. All MD simulation approaches yielded consistent melting points of either compound, except for the solid-alone simulation, while continuous heating of the vapor/solid/vapor system proved effective. The time scales of crystal growth and melting differ significantly between the molecules: 20 ns for nitromethane and 200 ns for acetic acid. Anisotropy in crystal growth and melting is non-negligible and much more pronounced for acetic acid compared to nitromethane. These findings offer practical considerations for simulating melting phenomena in molecular crystals using MD.
AB - Accurate melting point prediction is essential for investigating the molecular mechanisms of crystal growth and melting using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Here, we assess melting point predictions from direct MD simulations of nitromethane and acetic acid. This study has three objectives: to evaluate popular force fields (CGenFF, OPLS, GAFF), to assess various MD approaches (simulations of solid/liquid, vapor/solid/liquid/vapor, vapor/solid/vapor, and solid alone), and to compare the crystal growth and melting of both compounds, focusing specifically on the time scale and anisotropy. Our results indicate that none of the popular force fields accurately predict melting points, highlighting the need for improvement. All MD simulation approaches yielded consistent melting points of either compound, except for the solid-alone simulation, while continuous heating of the vapor/solid/vapor system proved effective. The time scales of crystal growth and melting differ significantly between the molecules: 20 ns for nitromethane and 200 ns for acetic acid. Anisotropy in crystal growth and melting is non-negligible and much more pronounced for acetic acid compared to nitromethane. These findings offer practical considerations for simulating melting phenomena in molecular crystals using MD.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007509830
U2 - 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c01753
DO - 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c01753
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105007509830
SN - 1528-7483
VL - 25
SP - 4169
EP - 4177
JO - Crystal Growth and Design
JF - Crystal Growth and Design
IS - 12
ER -