Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Medical model as metaphor: Old habits die hard

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

K. Chwalisz (2001) and S. Maltzman (2001) recognized that H. Ahn and B. E. Wampold's (2001) study demonstrated that component studies failed to identify specific ingredients responsible for therapeutic benefits but cautioned against rejecting a medical model of psychotherapy. The authors respond to their comments by discussing 5 fallacies: (a) The alternative to the medical model is a collection of common factors; (b) medical model language is appropriate for describing psychological treatments; (c) the medical model is valid, but only time will reveal evidence to support it; (d) rejection of the medical model implies separation from the medical establishment; and (e) a medical model conceptualization will further the mental health needs of diverse communities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-273
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Counseling Psychology
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Medical model as metaphor: Old habits die hard'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this