TY - JOUR
T1 - Maximizing biomass utilization
T2 - An integrated strategy for coproducing multiple chemicals
AU - Ahn, Byeongchan
AU - Jo, Sua
AU - Na, Jonggeol
AU - Jay Liu, J.
AU - Kim, Young Ju
AU - Won, Wangyun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Science Press
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Lignocellulosic biomass is one of the viable solutions to alleviate the global warming. However, the limited utilization of biomass majorly focused on cellulose and hemicellulose restricts the economic and environmental feasibilities. To cope with this issue, we proposed an integrated process of co-producing 1,6-hexanediol (1,6-HDO) with tetrahydrofuran and adipic acid from biomass, referred to as Strategy A. To compare the impacts of lignin upgrading and feedstock, Strategy B, which co-produces tetrahydrofuran alone, and Strategy C, which is the traditional route to produce 1,6-HDO from fossil fuels, were used. Heat networks are also designed to reduce operating costs and indirect carbon emissions due to energy consumption, saving 87% and 83% of the heat and cooling requirements, respectively, in Strategy A. The market competitiveness of Strategy A was evaluated by determining the minimum selling price through techno-economic analysis, and sustainability was thoroughly investigated by quantifying the environmental impacts through both midpoint and endpoint life-cycle assessments (LCAs). Strategy A was found to be the most favorable both economically (US$3,402/ton) and environmentally (−26.9 kg CO2 eq.). This indicates that lignin valorization is not only economically but also environmentally preferred. Finally, changes in economic and environmental feasibilities depending on economic, process, and environmental parameters were investigated using sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. The results of these analyses provide valuable insight into bio-based chemical production.
AB - Lignocellulosic biomass is one of the viable solutions to alleviate the global warming. However, the limited utilization of biomass majorly focused on cellulose and hemicellulose restricts the economic and environmental feasibilities. To cope with this issue, we proposed an integrated process of co-producing 1,6-hexanediol (1,6-HDO) with tetrahydrofuran and adipic acid from biomass, referred to as Strategy A. To compare the impacts of lignin upgrading and feedstock, Strategy B, which co-produces tetrahydrofuran alone, and Strategy C, which is the traditional route to produce 1,6-HDO from fossil fuels, were used. Heat networks are also designed to reduce operating costs and indirect carbon emissions due to energy consumption, saving 87% and 83% of the heat and cooling requirements, respectively, in Strategy A. The market competitiveness of Strategy A was evaluated by determining the minimum selling price through techno-economic analysis, and sustainability was thoroughly investigated by quantifying the environmental impacts through both midpoint and endpoint life-cycle assessments (LCAs). Strategy A was found to be the most favorable both economically (US$3,402/ton) and environmentally (−26.9 kg CO2 eq.). This indicates that lignin valorization is not only economically but also environmentally preferred. Finally, changes in economic and environmental feasibilities depending on economic, process, and environmental parameters were investigated using sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. The results of these analyses provide valuable insight into bio-based chemical production.
KW - Bioeconomy
KW - Biorefinery
KW - Carbon mitigation
KW - Climate change
KW - Global warming
KW - Lignin utilization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203491055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jechem.2024.08.042
DO - 10.1016/j.jechem.2024.08.042
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85203491055
SN - 2095-4956
VL - 100
SP - 180
EP - 191
JO - Journal of Energy Chemistry
JF - Journal of Energy Chemistry
ER -