Abstract
Since independence, Georgia's government has been implementing reforms seeking to eradicate corruption and attain market liberalization. It has not officially deployed an industrial policy promoting specific sectors. In recognizing unsuccessful economic performances, the government has been pursuing de facto industrial policy since the mid-2010s. This article explains Georgia's economic development strategy, which can be characterized as pursuing pro-market reform, liberalization, and lacking an official industrial policy. This study then explains the consequent economic performances by analyzing each major sector. Finally, this article presents the policy implications derived from Georgia's experience of market liberalization.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 333-355 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Perspectives on Global Development and Technology |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Minjung Kim and Jai S. Mah, 2024. Published with license by Koninklijke Brill BV.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- economic development
- Georgia
- industrial policy
- liberalization
- pro-market reform
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Market Liberalization and Georgia's De Facto Industrial Policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver