Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Long-term effectiveness on glycemic control of insulin compared to combined oral antidiabetic drugs for initial intensive treatment in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A duplicated target trial

  • Tae Hyeon Kim
  • , Yerin Hwang
  • , Selin Woo
  • , Kyeongmin Lee
  • , Yejun Son
  • , Seoyoung Park
  • , Hyunjee Kim
  • , Ju Young Shin
  • , Yong Hyun Cho
  • , Dahye Shin
  • , Dosang Cho
  • , Kyung Jae Lee
  • , Sang Youl Rhee
  • , Dong Keon Yon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although both intensive insulin therapy (IIT) and combined oral antidiabetic drugs (COAD) can achieve initial intensive glycemic control, evidence comparing their long-term effectiveness following initial remission remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare long-term glycemic control and the risk of drug-free remission failure between IIT and COAD in patients who successfully achieved initial intensive glycemic control. This duplicated target trial utilized a cohort of 60, 736 patients with type 2 diabetes from 3 hospitals in South Korea (2001–2024). Patients treated with insulin were assigned to the IIT group, and those receiving metformin combined with other oral antidiabetic drugs to the COAD group. Successful initial intensive treatment was defined as HbA1c <7.0% following treatment cessation. Failure of drug-free glycemic remission was defined as HbA1c ≥7.0% during follow-up. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazard model was employed to evaluate the risk of remission failure between groups, estimating adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Among 2092 patients achieving successful initial intensive treatment, each group assigned 355 following 1:1 propensity score matching (IIT group: mean age, 64.56 [standard deviation, 13.16] years; 49.0% female; COAD group: mean age, 64.08 [standard deviation, 12.90] years; 45.6% female). Baseline mean HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose were 6.26% and 115.4mg/dL in the IIT group, and 6.31% and 126.4mg/dL in the COAD group. During follow-up, HbA1c and body weight diverged significantly, with higher levels observed in the COAD group. The IIT group indicated a significant lower risk of drug-free glycemic remission failure compared to the COAD group (aHR, 0.47 [95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.73]). In patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes achieving successful initial intensive treatment, IIT was associated with better long-term glycemic control compared with COAD, despite treatment discontinuation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e47235
JournalMedicine (United States)
Volume105
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • insulin
  • metformin
  • oral antidiabetic drug
  • type 2 diabetes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term effectiveness on glycemic control of insulin compared to combined oral antidiabetic drugs for initial intensive treatment in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A duplicated target trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this