Abstract
Background: Scheduling simulation experiences for labor and delivery to promote optimal learning outcomes has not been fully investigated. Methods: This study compared self-efficacy, clinical-experience stress, and clinical-practice satisfaction between two groups of third-year nursing undergraduate students who experienced a different timing of simulations in an obstetrical rotation. One group of nursing students performed simulations before clinical practice (n = 42); a second group performed simulations after clinical practice (n = 38). Results: No significant differences emerged in scores of self-efficacy, clinical-experience stress, and clinical-practice satisfaction between the two groups. Survey questions on simulation timing demonstrated that 55 (69%) students preferred simulation practice at the end of obstetrics clinical rotations. Conclusions: Students reported individual preferences for various reasons. Nurse educators should consider students' viewpoints regarding the timing of labor and delivery simulations to provide optimal outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 24-27 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Clinical Simulation in Nursing |
| Volume | 20 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning
Keywords
- labor and delivery
- nursing students
- scheduling
- simulation
- timing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Labor and Delivery Simulation: Does Timing Matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver