L2 Acquisition and Processing of Korean Direct Object and Oblique Relative Clauses by English Speakers

Hyomin Min, Seung Ah Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examined the online comprehension of Korean direct object and oblique relative clauses (RCs) by English-speaking second language (L2) learners of Korean. A self-paced reading task and a follow-up picture selection task were conducted with adult English learners of Korean at intermediate and low proficiency levels, together with a control group of adult native Korean speakers. The results from the picture selection task showed that oblique RCs were characterized by longer response times and lower accuracy rates than direct object RCs reflecting the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy effect. The outcomes of the self-paced reading task, however, revealed that in the two L2 learner groups, as well as the native speaker group, the total reading time was longer for direct object RCs than for oblique RCs (though the difference was statistically significant for learners with low proficiency only). The longer total reading time for the Korean direct object condition can largely be attributed to the momentary processing difficulty of the oblique argument marked by a postposition. This may be due to the possibility that ditransitive constructions are more difficult to process than transitive constructions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-400
Number of pages46
JournalJournal of Cognitive Science
Volume24
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Institute for Cognitive Science, Seoul National University

Keywords

  • Korean relative clauses
  • L2 comprehension
  • noun phrase accessibility hierarchy (NPAH)
  • oblique relative clauses
  • self-paced reading
  • sentence processing
  • surprisal theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'L2 Acquisition and Processing of Korean Direct Object and Oblique Relative Clauses by English Speakers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this