Abstract
The two Japanese security laws which came into force on March 29, 2016, have faced severe domestic and international criticism. They are seen as representing a dramatic policy change in violation of due process and international norms, and representing a threat to international peace and security. This paper finds that while the direct implications of the "war" legislation are neither threatening nor without precedent, what the legislative process says about the nature of governance under Abe is deeply troubling. The disdain shown by the Abe administration to due process and constitutional procedures is what threatens domestic and international governance stability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 253-261 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of East Asia and International Law |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Article 9
- Governance
- Japan
- Legality
- Peace
- Security Legislation
- Threat
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Japanese 'war legislation': International and domestic threat assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver