TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigation of longitudinal data analysis
T2 - Hierarchical linear model and latent growth model using a longitudinal nursing home dataset
AU - Shin, Juh Hyun
AU - Shin, In Soo
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest,financial or otherwise.The current research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science,ICT & Future Planning) (2017R1A2B4003282). Address correspondence to Juh Hyun Shin,PhD,Associate Professor,Ewha Womans University,205 Helen Hall,52,Ewhayeodae-gil,Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea, 120-750; e-mail: juhshin@ewha.ac.kr. Received: February 15,2019; Accepted: June 19,2019 doi:10.3928/19404921-20191024-02
Funding Information:
The dataset is from a research project supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning project on the “Relationship Between Nurse Staff ing and Quality of Care in Nursing Homes” in Korea. The parent project investigated the relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care in nursing homes. Datasets accrued from 46 nursing homes that operated from 2014 to 2017.
Publisher Copyright:
© SLACK Incorporated.
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - The appropriate use of the data analysis method in a longitudinal design remains controversial in gerontological nursing research. The objective of the current study is to compare statistical approaches between a hierarchical-linear model (HLM) and a latent-growth model (LGM) in random eff ects, variance explained, growth trajectory, and model fi tness. Secondary analysis of longitudinal data was used. Two variables were chosen to demonstrate the comparison between statistical methods. The HLM was superior in addressing unbalanced data in repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate ANOVA because its nested data structure and random eff ects could be estimated. The LGM had advantages in modeling growth trajectories and model-fi t comparisons. Superior to the HLM, the LGM reported more acceptable data fi t, reporting a quadratic model, and successfully diff erentiated between and within components. The current research provides some evidence for applying appropriate statistical methods when addressing longitudinal datasets in gerontological nursing research.
AB - The appropriate use of the data analysis method in a longitudinal design remains controversial in gerontological nursing research. The objective of the current study is to compare statistical approaches between a hierarchical-linear model (HLM) and a latent-growth model (LGM) in random eff ects, variance explained, growth trajectory, and model fi tness. Secondary analysis of longitudinal data was used. Two variables were chosen to demonstrate the comparison between statistical methods. The HLM was superior in addressing unbalanced data in repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate ANOVA because its nested data structure and random eff ects could be estimated. The LGM had advantages in modeling growth trajectories and model-fi t comparisons. Superior to the HLM, the LGM reported more acceptable data fi t, reporting a quadratic model, and successfully diff erentiated between and within components. The current research provides some evidence for applying appropriate statistical methods when addressing longitudinal datasets in gerontological nursing research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075420302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3928/19404921-20191024-02
DO - 10.3928/19404921-20191024-02
M3 - Article
C2 - 31755964
AN - SCOPUS:85075420302
SN - 1940-4921
VL - 12
SP - 275
EP - 283
JO - Research in Gerontological Nursing
JF - Research in Gerontological Nursing
IS - 6
ER -