Intimate yet dysfunctional? The relationship between governance and conflict resolution in India and the European Union

Sandra Pogodda, Roger Mac Ginty, Oliver P. Richmond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The rise of India and the EU as global actors has sparked growing interest in their peace-building approaches. This paper compares the objectives and effects of the EU's and India's engagement in different conflict contexts within and alongside their borders. It examines whether their practices of conflict resolution or peace-building strive for more than conflict management or 'governmentality'. This article asks whether there is sufficient consistency across either actors' governance interventions to even speak of a distinct 'strategy' or 'governance culture'. It illustrates the close relationship between governance and conflict response initiatives but finds that the relationship is often dysfunctional.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-59
Number of pages27
JournalConflict, Security and Development
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Malaviya Centre for Peace Research at Benares Hindu University, Jawaharial Nehru University, the University of Delhi, Berghof Conflict Research, the Central European University in Budapest and the Istituto Affari Internazionale in Rome. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement 266931.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intimate yet dysfunctional? The relationship between governance and conflict resolution in India and the European Union'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this