How did we help (or not)? A qualitative analysis of helpful resources used by psychology trainees with disabilities

Emily M. Lund, Erin E. Andrews, Lauren M. Bouchard, Judith M. Holt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Little research has been conducted on the experiences of psychology trainees with disabilities, but there is growing evidence that this group of trainees faces a variety of barriers in their training. In this secondary analysis of data from 41 psychologists and psychology trainees with disabilities, we analyzed participants' responses to an open-ended question regarding what resources they found helpful during their training. Seven themes emerged: (a) no helpful resources; (b) professional supports and organizations; (c) mentor supports; (d) accommodations; (e) peer supports; (f) external supports in the form of health services; and (g) personal supports. Participants identified both formal and informal resources that were helpful, but more than a third of participants said that there were no disability-related resources that were helpful to them during their training. Implications for programs and trainees are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-248
Number of pages7
JournalTraining and Education in Professional Psychology
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Psychological Association.

Keywords

  • Disability
  • Professional psychology
  • Psychologists with disabilities
  • Psychology training
  • Resources

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How did we help (or not)? A qualitative analysis of helpful resources used by psychology trainees with disabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this