TY - JOUR
T1 - Higher blood pressure variability in white coat hypertension; from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry
AU - Kang, In Sook
AU - Pyun, Wook Bum
AU - Shin, Jinho
AU - Ihm, Sang Hyun
AU - Kim, Ju Han
AU - Park, Sungha
AU - Kim, Kwang Il
AU - Kim, Woo Shik
AU - Kim, Soon Gil
AU - Shin, Gil Ja
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 The Korean Society of Cardiology.
PY - 2016/5
Y1 - 2016/5
N2 - Background and Objectives: Blood pressure variability (BPV) was recently shown to be a risk factor of stroke. White coat hypertension (WCH) used to be regarded as innocuous, but one long-term follow-up study reported that WCH increased stroke rate compared to normotension (NT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between WCH and BPV. Subjects and Methods: We analyzed 1398 subjects from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Registry, who were divided into NT (n=364), masked hypertension (n=122), white coat hypertension (n=254), and sustained hypertension (n=658) groups. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. The average real variability (ARV), a highly sensitive BPV parameter, was highest in the WCH group, followed by the sustained hypertension, masked hypertension, and NT groups. The results persisted after being adjusted for covariates. The WCH vs. sustained hypertension results (adjusted mean±standard error) were as follows: 24-h systolic ARV, 22.9±0.8 vs. 19.4±0.6; 24-h diastolic ARV, 16.8±0.6 vs. 14.3±0.5; daytime systolic ARV, 21.8±0.8 vs. 16.8±0.6; and daytime diastolic ARV, 16.2±0.6 vs. 13.4±0.5 (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Conclusion: From the registry data, we found that subjects with WCH or masked hypertension had higher BPV than NT. However, long-term follow-up data assessing the clinical influences of WCH on stroke are needed.
AB - Background and Objectives: Blood pressure variability (BPV) was recently shown to be a risk factor of stroke. White coat hypertension (WCH) used to be regarded as innocuous, but one long-term follow-up study reported that WCH increased stroke rate compared to normotension (NT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between WCH and BPV. Subjects and Methods: We analyzed 1398 subjects from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Registry, who were divided into NT (n=364), masked hypertension (n=122), white coat hypertension (n=254), and sustained hypertension (n=658) groups. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. The average real variability (ARV), a highly sensitive BPV parameter, was highest in the WCH group, followed by the sustained hypertension, masked hypertension, and NT groups. The results persisted after being adjusted for covariates. The WCH vs. sustained hypertension results (adjusted mean±standard error) were as follows: 24-h systolic ARV, 22.9±0.8 vs. 19.4±0.6; 24-h diastolic ARV, 16.8±0.6 vs. 14.3±0.5; daytime systolic ARV, 21.8±0.8 vs. 16.8±0.6; and daytime diastolic ARV, 16.2±0.6 vs. 13.4±0.5 (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Conclusion: From the registry data, we found that subjects with WCH or masked hypertension had higher BPV than NT. However, long-term follow-up data assessing the clinical influences of WCH on stroke are needed.
KW - Ambulatory
KW - Blood pressure monitoring
KW - Blood pressure variability
KW - White coat hypertension
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979700531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.3.365
DO - 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.3.365
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84979700531
SN - 1738-5520
VL - 46
SP - 365
EP - 373
JO - Korean Circulation Journal
JF - Korean Circulation Journal
IS - 3
ER -