TY - JOUR
T1 - Heterogeneous living donor hepatic fat distribution on MRI chemical shift imaging
AU - Choi, Young Rok
AU - Lee, Jeong Min
AU - Yi, Nam Joon
AU - Kim, Hyeyoung
AU - Park, Min Su
AU - Hong, Geun
AU - Yoo, Tae
AU - Suh, Suk Won
AU - Lee, Hae Won
AU - Lee, Kwang Woong
AU - Suh, Kyung Suk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015, the Korean Surgical Society.
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - Purpose: We evaluated the heterogeneity of steatosis in living donor livers to determine its regional differences. Methods: Between June 2011 and February 2012, 81 liver donors were selected. Fat fraction was estimated using magnetic resonance triple-echo chemical shifting gradient imaging in 13 different regions: segment 1 (S1), S2, S3, and each peripheral and deep region of S4, S5, S6, S7, and S8. Results: There were differences (range, 3.2%-5.3%) in fat fractions between each peripheral and deep region of S4, S6, S7, and S8 (P < 0.001, P = 0.004, P < 0.001, and P = 0.006). Fat deposit amount in S1, S2, S3 and deep regions of S4-S8 were significantly different from one another (F [4.003, 58.032] = 8.684, P < 0.001), while there were no differences among the peripheral regions of S4-S8 (F [2.9, 5.3] = 1.3, P = 0.272) by repeated measure analysis of variance method. And regional differences of the amount of fat deposit in the whole liver increased as a peripheral fat fraction of S5 increased (R2 = 0.428, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Multifocal fat measurements for the whole liver are needed because a small regional evaluation might not represent the remaining liver completely, especially in patients with severe hepatic steatosis.
AB - Purpose: We evaluated the heterogeneity of steatosis in living donor livers to determine its regional differences. Methods: Between June 2011 and February 2012, 81 liver donors were selected. Fat fraction was estimated using magnetic resonance triple-echo chemical shifting gradient imaging in 13 different regions: segment 1 (S1), S2, S3, and each peripheral and deep region of S4, S5, S6, S7, and S8. Results: There were differences (range, 3.2%-5.3%) in fat fractions between each peripheral and deep region of S4, S6, S7, and S8 (P < 0.001, P = 0.004, P < 0.001, and P = 0.006). Fat deposit amount in S1, S2, S3 and deep regions of S4-S8 were significantly different from one another (F [4.003, 58.032] = 8.684, P < 0.001), while there were no differences among the peripheral regions of S4-S8 (F [2.9, 5.3] = 1.3, P = 0.272) by repeated measure analysis of variance method. And regional differences of the amount of fat deposit in the whole liver increased as a peripheral fat fraction of S5 increased (R2 = 0.428, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Multifocal fat measurements for the whole liver are needed because a small regional evaluation might not represent the remaining liver completely, especially in patients with severe hepatic steatosis.
KW - Fatty liver
KW - Liver transplantation
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Transplant donor site
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981736624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4174/astr.2015.89.1.37
DO - 10.4174/astr.2015.89.1.37
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84981736624
SN - 2288-6575
VL - 89
SP - 37
EP - 42
JO - Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
JF - Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
IS - 1
ER -