Glucose deprivation decreases nitric oxide production via NADPH depletion in immunostimulated rat primary astrocytes

  • Young Shin Chan
  • , Woong Choi Ji
  • , Ryun Ryu Jae
  • , Ho Ko Kwang
  • , Jung Jin Choi
  • , Hyun Soo Kim
  • , Hee Sun Kim
  • , Jae Chul Lee
  • , Sun Jung Lee
  • , Chun Kim Hyoung
  • , Won Ki Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

We have previously reported that the production of nitric oxide (NO) in immunostimulated astrocytes was markedly decreased under glucose-deprived conditions. The present study was undertaken to find the contributing factor(s) for the decreased NO production in glucose-deprived immunostimulated astrocytes. NO production in rat primary astrocytes was stimulated for 24-48 h by cotreatment with lipopolysaccharides (1 μg/ml) and interferon-γ (100 U/ml). Decreased NO production in immunostimulated astrocytes by glucose deprivation was mimicked by the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxyglucose and reversed by addition of pyruvate and lactate. Glucose deprivation did not alter the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in immunostimulated astrocytes. Addition of β-NADPH, but not tetrahydrobiopterine, both of which are essential cofactors for NOS function, completely restored the NO production that was decreased in glucose-deprived immunostimulated astrocytes. Glucose deprivation and immunostimulation synergistically reduced intracellular NADPH level in astrocytes. The results indicate that glucose deprivation decreases NO production in immunostimulated astrocytes by depleting intracellular NADPH, a cofactor of iNOS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-274
Number of pages7
JournalGLIA
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2002

Keywords

  • Cell death
  • Cofactor
  • Glutathione
  • Tetrahydrobiopterine
  • iNOS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Glucose deprivation decreases nitric oxide production via NADPH depletion in immunostimulated rat primary astrocytes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this