TY - JOUR
T1 - First-principles description of electrocatalytic characteristics of graphene-like materials
AU - Hartmann, Gregory
AU - Hwang, Gyeong S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Author(s).
PY - 2020/12/7
Y1 - 2020/12/7
N2 - Graphene-like materials (GLMs) have received much attention as a potential alternative to precious metal-based electrocatalysts. However, the description of their electrocatalytic characteristics may still need to be improved, especially under constant chemical potential. Unlike the case of conventional metal electrodes, the potential drop across the electrical double layer (φD) at the electrode-electrolyte interface can deviate substantially from the applied voltage (φapp) due to a shift of the Dirac point (eφG) with charging. This may in turn significantly alter the interfacial capacitance (CT) and the relationship between φapp and free-energy change (ΔF). Hence, accurate evaluation of the electrode contribution is necessary to better understand and optimize the electrocatalytic properties of GLMs. In this work, we revisit and compare first-principles methods available to describe the φapp-ΠF relation. Grand-canonical density functional theory is used to determine ΔF as a function of φapp or electrode potential (φq), from which the relative contribution of eφG is estimated. In parallel, eφG is directly extracted from a density functional theory analysis of the electronic structure of uncharged GLMs. The results of both methods are found to be in close agreement for pristine graphene, but their predictions deviate noticeably in the presence of adsorbates; the origin of the discrepancy is analyzed and explained. We then evaluate the application of the first-principle methods to prediction of the electrocatalytic processes, taking the reduction (hydrogenation) and oxidation (hydroxylation) reactions on pristine graphene as examples. Our work highlights the vital role of the modification of the electrode electronic structure in determining the electrocatalytic performance of GLMs.
AB - Graphene-like materials (GLMs) have received much attention as a potential alternative to precious metal-based electrocatalysts. However, the description of their electrocatalytic characteristics may still need to be improved, especially under constant chemical potential. Unlike the case of conventional metal electrodes, the potential drop across the electrical double layer (φD) at the electrode-electrolyte interface can deviate substantially from the applied voltage (φapp) due to a shift of the Dirac point (eφG) with charging. This may in turn significantly alter the interfacial capacitance (CT) and the relationship between φapp and free-energy change (ΔF). Hence, accurate evaluation of the electrode contribution is necessary to better understand and optimize the electrocatalytic properties of GLMs. In this work, we revisit and compare first-principles methods available to describe the φapp-ΠF relation. Grand-canonical density functional theory is used to determine ΔF as a function of φapp or electrode potential (φq), from which the relative contribution of eφG is estimated. In parallel, eφG is directly extracted from a density functional theory analysis of the electronic structure of uncharged GLMs. The results of both methods are found to be in close agreement for pristine graphene, but their predictions deviate noticeably in the presence of adsorbates; the origin of the discrepancy is analyzed and explained. We then evaluate the application of the first-principle methods to prediction of the electrocatalytic processes, taking the reduction (hydrogenation) and oxidation (hydroxylation) reactions on pristine graphene as examples. Our work highlights the vital role of the modification of the electrode electronic structure in determining the electrocatalytic performance of GLMs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097340054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/5.0031106
DO - 10.1063/5.0031106
M3 - Article
C2 - 33291888
AN - SCOPUS:85097340054
SN - 0021-9606
VL - 153
JO - Journal of Chemical Physics
JF - Journal of Chemical Physics
IS - 21
ER -