Examining arguments generated by year 5, 7, and 10 students in science classrooms

Aeran Choi, Andrew Notebaert, Juan Diaz, Brian Hand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

A critical component of science is the role of inquiry and argument in moving scientific knowledge forward. However, while students are expected to engage in inquiry activities in science classrooms, there is not always a similar emphasis on the role of argument within the inquiry activities. Building from previous studies on the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH), we were keen to find out if the writing structure used in the SWH approach helped students in Year 5, 7, and 10 to create well constructed arguments. We were also interested in examining which argument components were important for the quality of arguments generated by these students. Two hundred and ninety six writing samples were scored using an analysis framework to evaluate the quality of arguments. Step-wise multiple regression analyses were conducted to determine important argument components. The results of this study suggest that the SWH approach is useful in assisting students to develop reasonable arguments. The critical element determining the quality of the arguments is the relationship between the student's written claims and his or her evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-169
Number of pages21
JournalResearch in Science Education
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Arguments
  • Writing-to-learn

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining arguments generated by year 5, 7, and 10 students in science classrooms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this