Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of DA-9601 versus its new formulation, DA-5204, in patients with gastritis: Phase III, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study

  • Yoon Jin Choi
  • , Dong Ho Lee
  • , Myung Gyu Choi
  • , Sung Joon Lee
  • , Sung Kook Kim
  • , Geun Am Song
  • , Poong Lyul Rhee
  • , Hwoon Yong Jung
  • , Dae Hwan Kang
  • , Yong Chan Lee
  • , Si Hyung Lee
  • , Suck Chei Choi
  • , Ki Nam Shim
  • , Sang Yong Seol
  • , Jeong Seop Moon
  • , Yong Woon Shin
  • , Hyun Soo Kim
  • , Soo Teik Lee
  • , Jin Woong Cho
  • , Eun Kwang Choi
  • Oh Young Lee, Jin Seok Jang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of DA-9601 (Dong-A ST Co., Seoul, Korea) and its new formulation, DA-5204 (Dong-A ST Co.), for treating erosive gastritis. This phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority trial randomly assigned 434 patients with endoscopically proven gastric mucosal erosions into two groups: DA-9601 3 times daily or DA-5,204 twice daily for 2 weeks. The final analysis included 421 patients (DA-5204, 209; DA-9601, 212). The primary endpoint (rate of effective gastric erosion healing) and secondary endpoints (cure rate of endoscopic erosion and gastrointestinal [GI] symptom relief) were assessed using endoscopy after the treatment. Drug-related adverse events (AEs), including GI symptoms, were also compared. At week 2, gastric healing rates with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 42.1% (88/209) and 42.5% (90/212), respectively. The difference between the groups was -0.4% (95% confidence interval, -9.8% to 9.1%), which was above the non-inferiority margin of -14%. The cure rate of gastric erosion in both groups was 37.3%. The improvement rates of GI symptoms with DA-5204 and DA- 9601 were 40.4% and 40.8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in both secondary endpoints. AEs were reported in 18 (8.4%) patients in the DA-5204 group and 19 (8.8%) in the DA-9601 group. Rates of AE were not different between the two groups. No serious AE or adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurred. These results demonstrate the non-inferiority of DA-5204 compared to DA- 9601. DA-5204 is as effective as DA-9601 in the treatment of erosive gastritis. Registered randomized clinical trial at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02282670).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1807-1813
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Korean Medical Science
Volume32
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Keywords

  • Adverse drug event
  • Artemisia
  • Double-blind study
  • Endoscopy
  • Gastritis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of DA-9601 versus its new formulation, DA-5204, in patients with gastritis: Phase III, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this