Establishing consensus recommendations for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in South Korea: A modified Delphi study

Jae Young Joung, In Gab Jeong, Sung Gu Kang, Young Hwii Ko, Kyo Chul Koo, Kwang Hyun Kim, Myung Ki Kim, Soodong Kim, Jeong Hyun Kim, Sung Woo Park, Jae Young Park, Wan Song, Seung Hwan Lee, Seung Il Jung, Jae Hoon Chung, Chang Wook Jeong, Kwan Joong Joo, Seock Hwan Choi, Se Young Choi, Seol Ho ChooHong Koo Ha, Sung Kyu Hong, Sung Hoo Hong, Jeong Hee Hong, Jun Hyuk Hong, Sun Il Kim, Cheol Kwak, Seong Soo Jeon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Consensus is lacking among South Korean urologists on the appropriate treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). A modified, Delphi-based consensus on managing mHSPC patients was developed to support clinical decision-making. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six questions on mHSPC treatment were developed by an expert committee (five urologists). Nine questions required achievement of consensus (key questions). Twenty-three urologists participated in two rounds of a Delphi sur-vey. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement among panelists, with ≥90% agreement representing strong consensus. Results: Eighteen questions (50.0%) reached strong consensus, 15 (41.7%) reached consensus, and three (8.3%) reached no con-sensus. Eight key questions (88.9%) reached strong consensus and one (11.1%) reached consensus. Consensus was reached on rec-ommending androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) intensification, irrespective of disease volume or type, with an androgen recep-tor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) as the preferred option. Not using docetaxel alone with ADT when an ARPI is available for treatment intensification was recommended (strong consensus). For high-volume mHSPC patients with a pathogenic, speckle-type poxvirus and zinc finger protein mutation, ADT+ARPI was recommended over triplet therapy (strong consensus). Panelists recommended regular imaging every 6–12 months if no ARPI reimbursement restrictions exist, but a 3-month interval (per current reimburse-ment guidelines) otherwise. ADT+ARPI was the most recommended systemic treatment (strong consensus). Conclusions: This Delphi consensus established local consensus on controversial areas of mHSPC management. The findings offer meaningful perspectives that may help shape future treatment strategies and encourage thoughtful reconsideration of reimbursement criteria to align evidence and clinical practice in South Korea.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)416-430
Number of pages15
JournalInvestigative and Clinical Urology
Volume66
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Korean Urological Association.

Keywords

  • Consensus development
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Prostate cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Establishing consensus recommendations for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in South Korea: A modified Delphi study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this