TY - JOUR
T1 - End-of-life care in ICUs in East Asia
T2 - A comparison among China, Korea, and Japan
AU - Asian Collaboration for Medical Ethics (ACME) Study Collaborators and the Asian Critical Care Clinical Trials (ACCCT) Group
AU - Park, So Young
AU - Phua, Jason
AU - Nishimura, Masaji
AU - Deng, Yiyun
AU - Kang, Yan
AU - Tada, Keiichi
AU - Koh, Younsuck
AU - Du, Bin
AU - Qiu, Haibo
AU - Zhang, Xiangyu
AU - Dong, Yun
AU - Wan, Yong
AU - Gan, Cihai
AU - Zhang, Yawei
AU - Gao, Peiyang
AU - Chen, Hong
AU - Jia, Chao
AU - Xiao, Xianhua
AU - Xiang, Nutao
AU - Li, Jingsong
AU - Wang, Yushan
AU - Tang, Yaoqing
AU - Li, Jianguo
AU - An, Youzhong
AU - Ma, Xiaochun
AU - Wang, Xue
AU - Hu, Zhenjie
AU - Qin, Tiehe
AU - Tada, Keiichi
AU - Nakamura, Toshiaki
AU - Sanui, Masamitsu
AU - Fujino, Yuji
AU - Shiragami, Gotaroh
AU - Kotani, Joji
AU - Miyasho, Kohji
AU - Morisaki, Hiroshi
AU - Eguchi, Yutaka
AU - Takeda, Shinhiro
AU - Nishimura, Shinya
AU - Nishida, Osamu
AU - Tanigawa, Koichi
AU - Takada, Koji
AU - Oda, Sigeto
AU - Fukuoka, Toshio
AU - Sawamoto, Toru
AU - Hashimoto, Satoru
AU - Sobue, Kazuya
AU - Nishiyama, Kingo
AU - Morita, Kiyoshi
AU - Taniguchi, Hiroyuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Objectives: To compare physicians' perceptions and practice of end-of-life care in the ICU in three East Asian countries cultures similarly rooted in Confucianism. Design: A structured and scenario-based survey of physicians who managed ICU patients from May 2012 to December 2012. Setting: ICUs in China, Korea, and Japan. Subjects: Specialists who are either intensivists or nonintensivist primary attending physicians in charge of patients (195 in China, 186 in Korea, 224 in Japan). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Country was independently associated with differences in the practice of limiting multiple forms of life-sustaining treatments on multivariable generalized linear model analysis. Chinese respondents were least likely to apply do-not-resuscitate orders, even if they existed (p < 0.001). Japanese respondents were most likely to practice do not resuscitate for terminally ill patients during cardiac arrest, even when no such prior order existed (p < 0.001). Korean respondents' attitudes were in between those of Chinese and Japanese respondents as far as withdrawing total parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, dialysis, and suctioning was concerned. Chinese respondents were most uncomfortable discussing end-of-life care issues with patients, while Japanese respondents were least uncomfortable (p < 0.001). Chinese respondents were more likely to consider financial burden when deciding on limiting life-sustaining treatment (p < 0.001). Japanese respondents felt least exposed to personal legal risks when limiting life-sustaining treatment (p < 0.001), and the Korean respondents most wanted legislation to guide this issue (p < 0.001). The respondents' gender, religion, clinical experience, and primary specialty were also independently associated with the different perceptions of end-of-life care. Conclusions: Despite similarities in cultures and a common emphasis on the role of family, differences exist in physician perceptions and practices of end-of-life ICU care in China, Korea, and Japan. These findings may be due to differences in the degree of Westernization, national healthcare systems, economic status, and legal climate.
AB - Objectives: To compare physicians' perceptions and practice of end-of-life care in the ICU in three East Asian countries cultures similarly rooted in Confucianism. Design: A structured and scenario-based survey of physicians who managed ICU patients from May 2012 to December 2012. Setting: ICUs in China, Korea, and Japan. Subjects: Specialists who are either intensivists or nonintensivist primary attending physicians in charge of patients (195 in China, 186 in Korea, 224 in Japan). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Country was independently associated with differences in the practice of limiting multiple forms of life-sustaining treatments on multivariable generalized linear model analysis. Chinese respondents were least likely to apply do-not-resuscitate orders, even if they existed (p < 0.001). Japanese respondents were most likely to practice do not resuscitate for terminally ill patients during cardiac arrest, even when no such prior order existed (p < 0.001). Korean respondents' attitudes were in between those of Chinese and Japanese respondents as far as withdrawing total parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, dialysis, and suctioning was concerned. Chinese respondents were most uncomfortable discussing end-of-life care issues with patients, while Japanese respondents were least uncomfortable (p < 0.001). Chinese respondents were more likely to consider financial burden when deciding on limiting life-sustaining treatment (p < 0.001). Japanese respondents felt least exposed to personal legal risks when limiting life-sustaining treatment (p < 0.001), and the Korean respondents most wanted legislation to guide this issue (p < 0.001). The respondents' gender, religion, clinical experience, and primary specialty were also independently associated with the different perceptions of end-of-life care. Conclusions: Despite similarities in cultures and a common emphasis on the role of family, differences exist in physician perceptions and practices of end-of-life ICU care in China, Korea, and Japan. These findings may be due to differences in the degree of Westernization, national healthcare systems, economic status, and legal climate.
KW - Autonomy
KW - East Asian countries
KW - End-of-life care
KW - Intensive care unit
KW - Life-sustaining treatments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053841037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003138
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003138
M3 - Article
C2 - 29629982
AN - SCOPUS:85053841037
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 46
SP - 1114
EP - 1124
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 7
ER -