Effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in preventing febrile neutropenia during R-FC chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A multicenter prospective phase II study

Youngwoo Jeon, Duk Hwan Yang, Suk Joong Oh, Jin Hee Park, Jung Ah Kim, Sung Young Kim, Chul Won Choi, Won Sik Lee, In Ho Kim, Yeung Chul Mun, Gi June Min, Ki Seong Eom, Seok Goo Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: A chemotherapy of rituximab, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) has been accepted as a promising frontline chemotherapy in selected patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although R-FC regimen is a relatively dose-dense regimen and neutropenia incidence is more than 50%, primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim was not fully recommended in the clinical field. Therefore, the study evaluated the prophylactic effectiveness of pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia associated with R-FC of patients with CLL. Patients and methods: A single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic pegfilgrastim. Thirty-four CLL patients were enrolled and analyzed for neutropenia and other related factors, and comparative analysis was performed with historical cohort. Results: Compared with our historical cohort, incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia was remarkably reduced during any cycle of chemotherapy (14.7% vs. 48.2% of study cohort vs. historical cohort during C1, 5.9% vs. 65.8% during C2, 12.9% vs. 80.6% during C3, 10% vs. 84.6% during C4, 3.4% vs. 83.6% during C5, and 10.7% vs. 85.7% during C6, p <0.001). Also, cumulative incidence of disrupted chemotherapy was noticeably reduced in study cohort on any cycles of R-FC regimen (8.8% vs. 22.2% of study cohort vs. historical cohort on C2, 9.7% vs. 25.2% on C3, 13.4% vs. 26.9% on C4, 13.8% vs. 45.2% on C5, 17.9% vs. 47.3% on C6, p=0.007). In addition, treatment-related mortality was 5.9%, which significantly reduced compared to 9.6% of our historical cohort (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42–0.79, P = 0.032). Conclusion: Primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim is effective in the prevention of neutropenia/febrile neutropenia, and infection-related mortality during R-FC regimen in patients with CLL.

Original languageEnglish
Article number998014
JournalFrontiers in Oncology
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Jeon, Yang, Oh, Park, Kim, Kim, Choi, Lee, Kim, Mun, Min, Eom and Cho.

Keywords

  • R-FC regimen
  • chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • neutropenia
  • pegfilgrastim
  • prophylaxis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in preventing febrile neutropenia during R-FC chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A multicenter prospective phase II study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this