Effect of smoke-free legislation on Ticino gastronomy revenue

Peter J. Schulz, Uwe Hartung, Maddalena Fiordelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Objective To provide evidence on the effects of smokefree laws on gastronomy revenue in a European setting based on objective data. Damage to gastronomy revenue is a widely used argument against smoke-free legislation. Method Gastronomy revenue in Ticino is compared with the rest of Switzerland before and after Ticino banned smoking from gastronomy in April 2007, being the first (and at the time of the study only) Swiss canton to do that. The study uses breakdowns by cantons of taxable revenue of gastronomy branches and retailers (for comparison) provided by the Swiss tax authorities for the years 2005-2008. Results Revenues of restaurants and bars were not damaged by the Ticino smoke-free law. Decreases in Ticino happened before the smoke-free law came into effect. Evidence for night clubs is inconclusive. Discussion The absence of detrimental effects on restaurant and bar revenue corroborates the gist of research on the subject from other countries. The argument that the decline of bar and restaurant sales prior to the implementation of the ban might have occurred in anticipation of the new regulation is not considered tenable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)861-866
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Public Health
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Bruno Jeitziner, Mario Morger and Jean-Louis Rochat of the Eidgenössische Steuer-verwaltung for making their data available, and to Michel Schneider for doing early research into the tax data availability. The study was funded by the Swiss Tobacco Prevention Fund.


  • Gastronomy revenue
  • Smoke-free legislation
  • Smoking ban
  • Switzerland
  • Tobacco control


Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of smoke-free legislation on Ticino gastronomy revenue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this