Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes focusing on the functional outcome and clinical results of replacement arthroplasty (AP) vs. internal fixation (IF) for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture in elderly. Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on 10 available clinical studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 8 comparative studies). Subgroup analysis was performed by type of methodological quality. Partial weight bearing time in AP group was earlier than that in IF group (SMD = -0.86; 95% CI = -0.42, 1.29; P = 0.050). The overall outcomes such as mortality, reoperation rate, and complication showed no significant diffrence between the 2 groups (AP vs. IF). Therefore, this systematic review demonstrates that AP provides superior functional outcomes especially earlier mobilization, as compared to IF in elderly patients with an unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 858-867 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Korean Medical Science |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 May 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.
Keywords
- Arthroplasty
- Fracture fixation
- Hip fractures
- Meta-analysis