Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of concept-mapping strategies with three different generativity levels (expert-generated concept map, partially learner-generated concept map, fully learner-generated concept map) on knowledge acquisition. Interaction between learners' self-regulated learning (SRL) skills and different levels of generativity was also tested. One hundred twenty-four undergraduate students, randomly assigned to three different concept-mapping groups, were differentiated by high and low levels of SRL skills. The findings suggest that the participants in the fully learner-generated map group significantly outperformed the participants in the expert-generated map group, and participants with high SRL skills significantly outperformed those with low SRL skills across all treatment levels.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 606-618 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | British Journal of Educational Technology |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does concept-mapping strategy work for everyone? the levels of generativity and learners' self-regulated learning skills'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver