Differences in peritumoral pseudocapsule characteristics according to clinicopathological factors in clinical T1a renal tumors

Myong Kim, Woo Suk Choi, Chang Wook Jeong, Ja Hyeon Ku, Hyeon Hoe Kim, Kyung Chul Moon, Cheol Kwak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the status of peritumoral pseudocapsules in renal tumors and the effects of clinicopathological factors on their formation. Methods: From January 2011 to December 2012, 258 patients with solitary clinical stage T1a renal tumors who underwent partial nephrectomy were analyzed. Status of pseudocapsule was re-evaluated by a pathologist. Results: The mean long diameter (± SD) of the tumor and the width of the safety margin were 2.17 (± 0.94) cm and 3.2 (± 2.4) mm, respectively. A complete pseudocapsule was identified in 152 (58.9%) tumors, an incomplete pseudocapsule was identified in 69 (26.7%) tumors, and no pseudocapsule was identified in 37 (14.3%) tumors. Out of 152 tumors with complete pseudocapsules, 45 (29.6%) were confirmed to directly invade the renal parenchyma. In a multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.045; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.021-1.070, P < 0.001) and histologic subtype (chromophobe type: OR, 19.455; 95% CI, 4.233-89.471, P < 0.001; oncocytoma: OR, 11.307; 95% CI, 1.357-94.198, P = 0.025) were significant factors for an incomplete or absent pseudocapsule. Conclusions: Peritumoral pseudocapsules are absent or incomplete in a significant portion of renal tumors. Old age as well as chromophobe and oncocytoma histologic subtypes were significant risk factors for an incomplete or absent peritumoral pseudocapsule.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11323-11331
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
Volume8
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Partial nephrectomy
  • Pathologic finding
  • Peritumoral pseudocapsule
  • Renal tumor
  • Surgical margin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in peritumoral pseudocapsule characteristics according to clinicopathological factors in clinical T1a renal tumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this